To what extent do the following practices reflect your commitment to transparency and openness in scholarly publishing?
* Indicates required question
I disseminate my research work through subject and/or institutional repositories prior to publication in a journal. *
I leverage social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, blogs etc.) to promote my research. *
I share links to my publications and relevant news about their publication on social media. *
I post the peer-reviewed version of my publications on scholarly social media platforms (e.g. ResearchGate, LinkedIn, Academia, etc). *
I participate in online forums (including social media platforms) and share insights from my research process. *
I included data as supplementary materials in a published paper. *
I host data on a website, making files available for download. *
I host data on digital repositories such as Dryad, Figshare and Zenodo. *
I share my data to enhance the reproducibility of research findings. *
I share data to facilitate its reuse by others. *
I share data to facilitate its preservation and ensure future accessibility. *
I share data to support, promote, and comply with open science policies. *
I share data to ensure compliance with journal publication policies. *
I share data to increase the chances of getting cited. *
I share data to enhance the credibility of my research. *
I share data to encourage others to use and engage in research collaborative efforts. *
I share data as a commitment to open science practices. *
I share not only my research outcomes but also highlights the methodologies and challenges encountered. *
In the research paper that I co-authored, I made significant contributions to writing the paper. *
In the research paper that I co-authored, my contribution involved reviewing the literature. *
In the research paper that I co-authored, I played a role in editing the paper. *
In research paper that I co-authored, I contributed to conducting the fieldwork. *
In research paper that I co-authored, I contributed to analysing the data. *
In research paper that I co-authored, I contributed to finding funds for the research. *
In the research paper that I co-authored, I played a role in securing funds for open access publishing (APC). *
In the research paper that I co-authored, I contributed to the production or collection of data. *
I acknowledge the support of funder(s) for their financial contribution to the paper I authored. *
I declare any potential conflict of interest in the paper I authored. *
Publishing in an open-access journal has enhanced my visibility and discoverability. *
Publishing in an open access journal significantly expanded my potential audience. *
Participating in open access publishing has increased my opportunities for networking and connectivity. *
Participating in open access publishing has increased my opportunities for collaboration. *
Participating in open access publishing has increased my impact through increased downloads, reads, citations, and social media mentions. *
Publishing in open access journals offers me speedy publication and reduced turnaround time. *
Publishing in open access journals meets my university's compliance requirements and satisfies funders. *
Open access publishing expedites the advancement of my scientific progress. *
I actively sharing my research findings through open-access platforms enhances transparency and accessibility in scholarly publishing. *
As a reviewer, I prefer the 'single-blind' model where the author does not know the identities of the reviewers. *
As a reviewer, I prefer the 'double-blind' model where both the reviewers and authors do not know each other's identities. *
As a reviewer, I prefer the 'triple-blind' model, where not only are authors and reviewers blind to each other's identities, but editors are also unaware of the identities of both. *
As a reviewer, I prefer the 'open identities' model where the reviewer's name is disclosed and published. *
As a reviewer, I prefer the 'open reports' model, where the content of the review is made public. *
As a reviewer, I prefer a model where papers are reviewed after publication. *
Embracing open peer review practices and connecting with peers on social media platforms showcase my dedication to transparency in the scholarly publishing landscape. *
My research team members include both genders (male and female). *
I collaborate with researchers from various international locations as co-authors. *
I collaborate with colleagues within my department as co-authors. *
I collaborate with individuals within my discipline as co-authors. *
I collaborate with individuals from cross-disciplinary backgrounds as co-authors. *
Engaging in collaborative projects and fostering connections with fellow researchers exemplify my commitment to openness in scholarly communication. *
I make sure my methodology is detail enough for reproducibility. *
I describe the limitations of my research and any uncertainties in my results or areas that need more exploration or further investigation. *
I am willing to disclose research processes and outcomes on demand when requested by publishers or public. *
I submit my research as preprints before formal peer-reviewed publication *
I exclusively upload my preprints to a trusted preprint server. *
I prioritize sharing draft versions of my research on preprint servers. *
I received feedback on my preprints that influenced the final version of my published work. *
I have produced a high-quality piece intended for publication in a preprint to offer readers reliable information, considering that this version has not yet undergone peer review. *
I have experienced numerous advantages by publishing my work as a preprint, such as achieving highest citation rates. *